Review 1:Too much button, not enough zip by chris tookey
This critique is negative it takes an inside looking out view he puts himself in the storyline and mentions a quick summary on the movie without putting you off, it looks at the romantic side of the film with a picture of the couple in the middle of the review. i enjoyed the humour of the critique i thought he was quite funny which obviously kept me reading. i however disliked the fact he kept banging on about the length of the movie i thought it was good that he mentioned it but it started to feel irrelevant.the critique also made refrence to other text notably films the director has done before and the films brad pitt has acted in, this was just used to compare the films.the original source is mail online which you could say is a reliable source.I dont think this will affect the critiques position as it wasnt BIG,it was just standard. i found the comments intresting but they just agreed with what he had to say and the one comment against was too emotional. other than that i felt it was a good review but i felt the critique was annoying at times.

Review 2:Story of ageing backwards deserves lavish praise by Mickey Mcmonagle
The review is positive and the critc takes the angle of trying to understand the film and portrays it in a positive light without getting emotional, i like the compariosn with forest gump because i havent seen the film but i have watched forest gump so it painted a good picture in my head.
I disliked the fact that it wasnt long enough it was just too short which was a shame. they make reference to foredy gump and abit of background history on the director which was good giving us an insight into the director previous life. the original source is the sunday mail and i dont feel it was a reliable source as it is not taken serious by the people and it doesnt target the wider audience. it could affect the comments as the audience may not be intrested in his text because it doesnt aim it at the relevant audience. i dont think i learnt alot as it was too short and too simple.